Jurists and the judiciary have disagreed on the nature and function of administrative committees with judicial jurisdiction, or what are called quasi-judicial committees, with some considering them judicial committees, administrative committees, or administrative committees with judicial jurisdiction. Additionally, there is the issue of determining the legal nature of the decisions issued by these committees whether they are considered judicial rulings or administrative decisions with a judicial character. The law and the judiciary have resolved this debate by defining the nature and function of these committees.
This study adopted the analytical legal approach for all jurisprudential opinions and judicial rulings in order to reach the prevailing trend, as well as the comparison between the Egyptian and Iraqi constitutional systems, while addressing the Lebanese constitutional system as an inference rather than a deep comparison. The nature of the research topic requires dividing it into two requirements, the first deals with the position of jurisprudence on the authorities with judicial jurisdiction, while the second requirement deals with the position of the administrative and constitutional judiciary on the authorities with judicial jurisdiction, and then we review the most prominent results and recommendations that this study has reached.