Force Majeure is one of the issues that pose a real threat to contracts in general and international trade contracts in particular, because these contracts are characterized by their wide extension outside the borders of the state, and thus their exposure to these obstacles is a possible matter. International trade contracts raise a lot of controversy in the context of determining the law that imposes its authority over them in normal circumstances, so what if they were exposed to exceptional and unforeseen circumstances. It is known that international trade contracts are subject to the principle of the power of will, as are the contracts that take place in internal dealings, although some opinions call for the necessity of submitting these contracts to the place of conclusion, while the subjection of international trade contracts to the law of will does not collide with subjecting these contracts to place Conclusion Because the parties to the contract, when they agreed to submit this contract to the law of will, they referred to the law of the place of conclusion, meaning that international commercial contracts or others are related to the rules of attribution, but this link between these contracts and the rules of attribution may sometimes fail to find the appropriate solution as is the case When a force majeure occurs that prevents the implementation of the obligation from one or both parties, and this is what drives us to discuss this issue within the hypotheses of rigid or flexible attribution or the theory of distinctive performance, so can the judge to whom the dispute is presented to rely on the previous assumptions