All modern constitutions and the laws regulating the work of the judiciary are concerned with adopting the principle of the independence of the judiciary, its impartiality and the inadmissibility of intervening in its affairs. However, the principle is that this principle is often more theoretical than practical. The judiciary may often be subjected to pressures and influences from parties Multiple. The judiciary has a great role in the protection of rights and freedoms and the response to the assault on them. The penal legislation has unanimously agreed to criminalize everything that prejudices its independence and impartiality, including "INTERVENTION with or in harming a judge or court in favour of one of the litigants.
Often, some exploit their influence, influence, Pressure on the judge that the latter is the son of the society in which the judiciary and as he assumes his functions in a society where the impact of some individuals on each other is not immune to the impact on him and may not find a way to respond to him that the judge no matter how strong and solid in his approval may not Can withstand the pressures and The effects exerted by the person with whom the relationship of kinship, marriage, or personal relations are connected is such that the judge, like any other child, ties with other individuals personal or family relations or the working relationship in the judiciary, which makes them a source of influence in his or her judiciary. And the impact on the independence of the judiciary and the public's confidence in its integrity and fairness and its fundamental role in preserving rights and freedoms has attracted the attention of the international legislator, where it has criminalized several international agreements, some of which concern the independence of the judiciary. Of which disturb judicial independence and impartiality, and some of them deals with the subject of human rights on the grounds that, including the human right of the accused to receive a fair trial in which the necessary legal guarantees are available, and some regard to crimes of administrative corruption, which was considered to mediate with the judges of these crimes.
.