The state sometime faces particular extraordinary situations that led to instability in political, security and social conditions, as a result rights and life of individuals would be in threat or it probably would be violated legally and illegally. The internal law is often formed to face usual situation, extraordinary law should be in tiny space, with this status the state should balance between its obligations of principle of legality and maintaining and not violated of individual rights and freedom. If state violated it obligation in that contexts it would be without any doubt override its professions that is specified in the constitution and failed in meeting its citizen need as rights and freedom.
The state exercise extraordinary power when its sovereignty or security face internal or external armed offensive as in war or in turmoil and revolutions, as a result for that the state applies laws that aim to reduce the effect of violation of individual rights, in the same time state would be under internal and external monitoring in its decision that come in such situation.
International human rights conventions have provisions that explicitly allow to its members to decomposition of some of its obligation in emergency status that threat nation’s life. However that allowance is not absolute but it has specific conditions that prevent states to have final decision on how it would exercise its extraordinary power in imposing some restriction on individual rights, and make the state responsible toward international community on any violation
In this paper that focused on practical side of the subject more than theoretical side, I study that subject in details, in addition comparison of some documents also have been made.
At the end I conclude the main result that I hope it will find its ways in the constitution and legal provisions that study the subject.